Number 112
In this issue:
- Our revolt will be raw
- Rising up against the surveillance state
- Arms firm in police bribe scandal
- Sheeple
- Carl Jung: an organic radical inspiration
- Acorninfo
1. Our revolt will be raw
by editor Paul Cudenec (who reads the bulletin here)
A special kind of strength kicks in when a living being is staring death in the face.
A cornered animal, a mother protecting her child or a warrior battling on against the odds can all draw on a final reserve of vital force that might allow them to repel the mortal threat.
This is where 99% of humankind find ourselves today – the psychopathic globalist system is tightening its totalitarian grip on our throats, an evil glint of triumph in its soulless eyes as it relishes our imminent demise.
And so, collectively, we have to respond with a great upsurge of life that can kick the murderous assailant away.
This is not something we need to think about, or plan, or justify.
We need to simply surrender to the gut feeling within us that knows things are going badly wrong in this world, that all the money and power lie in the greedy hands of the very worst specimens of our species.
We need to scream in their faces, tear up their orders, push down their barriers, smash up their machines, thrash and wriggle our way out of their grip, break their taboos and laugh out loud at their admonitions and threats.
We are past the point now of considering the possible consequences of what we do, because nothing could be worse than the fate which these demons have in mind for us.
We have to push the “civilised” and conditioned side of our minds out of the way and allow something much older and wilder to take hold of us.
Our brains make way for our hearts, now, and our intellects make way for our souls.
This raw and primal reaction can only emerge from within each individual, although the ultimate source will, of course, be the great organic Whole to which we all belong.
It will take a different form in each of us, depending on who exactly we are and what exactly we are capable of doing if we really need to.
But the outcome will be collective – a frisson of defiant and visceral energy sent shuddering through the bodies of billions of human beings, a spasm of mass revolt on a never-imagined scale.
If you are thinking that this will never happen, you need to cast that thought – and all thoughts – aside and simply let yourself be swept away by the life-restoring floodwaters of freedom.
2. Rising up against the surveillance state
As the global mafia accelerates its bid to condemn us all to digital slavery, there are encouraging signs of resistance.
This is particularly so in the USA, where citizens are taking matters into their own hands and destroying or disabling surveillance cameras.
Much of the focus has been on Flock cameras, although campaigners are reminding people that it is not about a brand but a system and other makes of camera are just as bad. They not only film car number plates, but pick up information from phones, allowing a real-time AI-fuelled tracking system.
One X user posted: “Regular Americans are out here cutting down Flock cameras left and right. Authorities are losing control as more people see this tech for what it is – straight-up unconstitutional mass surveillance on citizens.
“It’s turning into a real trend. Guys are using cordless battery-powered tools to take out the poles fast because they’re light, quiet, and get the job done quick. This mass surveillance nonsense has to stop. Everywhere”.
Another pointed out that “public distaste for the cameras is growing nationwide” – police are struggling to make arrests because of a general reluctance to assist them with their investigations.
As reports flood in from all across the country, freedom lovers are promoting Hallowe’en 2026 (October 31) as De-Flock America night – an evening when the streets are full of people wearing masks of the non-medical variety.
Data centres are also proving a spark for public unrest, swallowing up water and power supplies in order to fuel the control matrix of which the cameras are part.
Protesters disrupted a speech by Donald Trump in July and with anger understandably on the rise, more of the same is expected.
Even Amazon’s engineers are in on the rebellion, storming the stage at a corporate event in protest at the business’s involvement in Project Nimbus, which helps Israel use AI to conduct its ongoing genocide.
In other protest news, residents of Venice turned out in force against the arrival, on his superyacht, of billionaire Tilman J. Fertitta, the US ambassador to Italy, and 5G masts are being torched in India.
We can do this!
3. Arms firm in police bribe scandal
Arms firm BAE Systems tried to bribe British political police into infiltrating a group trying to stop war crimes, Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) has revealed.
Evidence in the Undercover Policing Inquiry recently showed that BAE Systems, the UK’s largest “defence” (war) company, offered the Metropolitan Police money to spy on anti arms trade campaigners following the 1996 Seeds of Hope Ploughshares action which caused £1.4m damage to Hawk aircraft.
Four women were acquitted of criminal damage charges on the basis that they were preventing a greater crime by taking action to stop BAE Systems exporting the aircraft to Indonesia for their use in war crimes against people in East Timor.
The information was disclosed during the questioning of former Detective Chief Inspector Dell on July 1 2026. Dell managed the Special Demonstration Squad/Special Duties Squad (SDS) between 2001-2005, and worked on C-squad – the Special Branch department that dealt with protest – prior to this.
During questioning about the links between private companies and police spies, Dell stated: “I remember someone on C-squad telling me that BAE Systems had suffered another attack…BAE had offered the Branch money to finance, so resources could be put into this”.
Dell denied that Special Branch took the money: “Even though the Branch could well have done with the money, they made the offer to the Commissioner, obviously, and it had to be declined”.
It appears likely that this refusal led BAE Systems to take matters into their own hands. The Seeds of Hope action took place in 1996, and by 1997, BAE Systems had embedded its own corporate spy, Martin Hogbin, at CAAT. Hogbin remained at CAAT until 2003.
However, this also didn’t stop the police’s SDS spying on CAAT throughout this period. HN3, cover name “Jason Bishop”, was also authorised to target CAAT. Former Detective Sergeant Ron Gilbertson, HN49, stated that Bishop was “authorised to target CAAT because the group was known to hold protests and demonstrations, which had the potential to result in serious public disorder”.
Bishop also targeted Disarm DSEI, the coalition group organising against the DSEI arms fair, and was close friends with CAAT’s media coordinator, Emily Apple. However, documents revealed in the inquiry show that anti arms trade campaigners weren’t targeted because of the threat they posed to public order, but because their protests “could influence the financial wellbeing of the state”.
CAAT’s Emily Apple said: “BAE Systems went to extraordinary lengths to spy on anti arms trade campaigners, and intrude into our lives. This is a private company essentially prepared to bribe the police for information about its critics. There are serious questions that the Inquiry needs to investigate about the complicity between successive governments, the police, and arms companies to repress our right to protest in order to protect a trade that is complicit in multiple genocides and human rights abuses.
“However, it’s important to remember that this is not historical. The power of the arms trade to influence both government and policing policy is in evidence today. This is shown clearly in the proscription of Palestine Action, with documents detailing meetings Elbit Systems had, not just with the Home Office but with the Attorney General’s office, about how to crack down on protesters.
“Successive governments have tried to label our protests as unlawful or undemocratic. However, it is the arms trade, the government, and the police that are profoundly undemocratic, repeatedly subverting the law to repress, surveil and harass our protests”.
Meanwhile, BAE Systems Inc. has agreed to pay a $36 million civil penalty to resolve US allegations involving 104 violations of arms export rules, reported Eurasia Business News on August 14 2026.
“The settlement, announced by the US State Department, concerns unauthorized exports of defense-related technical data and equipment, including one instance involving China”, it wrote, noting that this follows a longer history of US enforcement against the company.
“In 2010, BAE Systems plc pleaded guilty to conspiracy-related charges and agreed to pay a $400 million criminal fine”.
4. Sheeple
Trained to heed at whiplash speed
its shepherd's every beck and call
a rigorously-mis-if-informed-at-all
conditioned-to-never-question
drilled-to-mindless-perfection
conformity-addicted flock
is one which is by design
not simply beset with cognitive rot
but is from all indications unable
to exercise critical thought;
is as if from some sinister fable
a flock whose mesmerized members
are as a matter of Pavlovian course
the sort of invaluable
fabulously malleable
well-behaved slaves
who're inarguably key to the scheming
criminocracy at large and in charge
in its ceaseless push
to shape and orchestrate opinion
by insidiously triggering
exquisitely predictable emotions
in a meticulously brainwashed populace
finely programmed to lie wide open
to even the most painfully obvious
of its treacherous shepherd's
manipulative methods.
5. Carl Jung: an organic radical inspiration
The latest in our series of profiles from the organic radicals website.
Carl Jung (1875-1961) was a highly influential 20th century thinker and writer, a practising psychiatrist and the founder of analytical psychology.
His central concept was of a universal human unconscious which informs the thinking and being of each and every individual.
This idea of an inner pattern to the human mind, of innate tendencies informing everything we think and do, is crucial for the classical anarchist, and thus organic radical, vision.
It underpins Peter Kropotkin’s suggestion of a sense of mutual aid for which human beings (and all other animals) have a natural capacity and even inclination.
It is because we are born with the potential for co-operation, for an appreciation of right and wrong, justice and injustice, that it is not only unnecessary but also unhealthy to impose upon us social structures and laws which block the functioning of our natural collective sensibilities.
The deep ideological significance of Jung’s philosophy was appreciated by, among others, the English anarchist Herbert Read, who befriended Jung and edited his works.
Another anarchist friend of Jung’s, Otto Gross, described how these universally-shared innate anarchistic tendencies were repressed by contemporary society.
Jung’s work also reinforces Noam Chomsky’s criticism of the very prevalent “empty organism” fallacy, in which human beings are imagined to be born with blank slates for minds.
Jung insisted: “Mind is not born as a tabula rasa. Like the body, it has its pre-established individual definiteness; namely, forms of behaviour. They become manifest in the ever-recurring patterns of psychic functioning.
“As the weaver bird will build its nest infallibly in its accustomed form, so man despite his freedom and superficial changeability will function psychologically according to his original patterns – up to a certain point”. (1)
Behind the invisible structure of our innate mind, Jung saw the existence of archetypes, which James Hillman describes as “the most fundamental patterns of human existence”. (2)
Jung himself made it clear that these archetypes are very real: “Archetypes are not whimsical inventions, but autonomous elements of the unconscious psyche which were there before any invention was thought of. They represent the unalterable structure of a psychic world whose ‘reality’ is attested by the determining effects it has upon the conscious mind”. (3)
But, at the same time, like Chomsky’s ability to learn language, they emerged initially in the shape of a capacity, a potential which needed to be triggered by contact with the outside world.
Explained Jung: “They are eternally inherited forms and ideas which have at first no specific content. Their specific content only appears in the course of the individual’s life, when personal experience is taken up in precisely these forms”. (4)
Jung, a German-speaking Swiss, was clearly influenced by the German Romantic tradition but later in life expanded his research further afield to reinforce its universal relevance.
His belief in a “world soul”, humanity’s collective unconscious, was inspired by his conversations with black mental patients in the USA, with North American Indians, with Tunisians and with East African tribespeople. (5)
Biographer Frank McLynn notes that Jung always had “a deep hatred of colonialism, whether of the formal type practised in the British empire, or the informal ‘internal’ type practised in the USA, where whites subdued and bullied Native Americans”. (6)
Inspired by the alchemical tradition, Jung saw a positive life energy inside every human being, which his psychoanalytical methods sought to uncover and empower.
He wrote in Psychology and Alchemy: “The substance that harbours the divine secret is everywhere, including the human body. It can be had for the asking and can be found anywhere, even in the most loathsome filth”. (7)
Richard Noll refers to this approach as “Jung’s promise of liberation, of freedom, of becoming a continually self-re-creating individual in a state of constant becoming, a perpetual revolution of the soul”. (8)
Jung’s therapeutic approach is anarchic, being based on allowing healthy energy to arise from within the person, rather than trying to repress supposedly unhealthy traits.
Jung wrote: “It is rewarding to watch patiently the silent happenings in the soul, and the most and the best happens when it is not regulated from outside and from above”. (9)
Art, for Jung, was essentially the same process taking place. The universal living energy was channelled by the individual artist to carry out their work.
He wrote in 1933, in Modern Man in Search of a Soul: “What is essential in a work of art is that it should rise far above the realm of personal life and speak from the spirit and heart of the poet as man to the spirit and heart of mankind.
“Art is a kind of innate drive that seizes a human being and makes him its instrument. The artist is not a person endowed with free will who seeks his own ends, but one who allows art to realize its purposes through him”. (10)
Jung said the living spirit behind human creativity, in all fields, was eternally renewed and had been constantly shaping, guiding and inspiring us throughout the existence of our species.
It appeared in so many guises that it was impossible to define it in any rigid way: “Measured against it, the names and forms which men have given it mean little enough; they are only the changing leaves and blossoms on the stem of the eternal tree”. (11)
1. C.G. Jung, Psyche & Symbol: A Selection from the Writings of C.G. Jung, ed. by Violet S. de Laszlo (New York: Anchor Books, 1958), p. xv-xvi.
2. James Hillman, Archetypal Psychology: A Brief Account (Dallas: Spring Publications, 1990), p. 3.
3. Jung, Psyche & Symbol, p. 108.
4. Jung, Psyche & Symbol, p. 293.
5. Frank McLynn, Carl Gustav Jung (New York: St Martin’s Griffin, 1998), p. 289.
6. McLynn, p. 276.
7. C.G. Jung, Psychology and Alchemy (London: Routledge, 1989), p. 313.
8. Richard Noll, The Jung Cult: The Origins of a Charismatic Movement (London: Fontana, 1996), p. 257.
9. Jung, Psychology and Alchemy, p.102.
10. C.G. Jung, Modern Man in Search of a Soul (London: Routledge & Kegan, 1978), pp. 194-95.
11. Jung, Modern Man in Search of A Soul, p. 282.
6. Acorninfo
In an essential hour-long video, Steven Ben-Nun presents the shocking reality of the Noahide Laws, the global legal infrastructure through which judeo-supremacists aim to reduce “goyim” to a condition of debased servitude to the “chosen” people in their totalitarian New World Order.
* * *
“A government that wishes to criminalize political opposition does not need new laws. It needs new readings of the laws it already has, prosecutors instructed to charge aggressively, and judges willing to ratify. Each of these conditions now exists. The legal theory that just sent nine Americans to prison for terms longer than most murderers serve was authored by an Israel-funded think-tank researcher, adopted by the Justice Department, and ratified by federal judges”. Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez describes “The Mussolini Playbook In a Texas Courtroom” with regard to defendants now known as the Prairieland Nine.
* * *
Journalists in Britain (as elsewhere) are being sacked and blacklisted if they dare to criticise Israel and/or Zionism. An excellent half-hour conversation between former LBC radio journalist Sangita Myska and Richard Sanders confirms yet again the grim reality of the judeo-supremacist occupation. Wake up, it’s not a “conspiracy theory”!
* * *
Recommended viewing: an important August 2026 edition of UK Column News in which Ben Rubin and Brian Gerrish describe how England and its way of life are being systematically destroyed in the interests of a psychopathic and parasitical global mafia (our phrase, not theirs!).
* * *
“The government serves money and that’s all there is to it… Now we’re going to be integrated with another country, we will become Israel-America. And we don’t have first amendment rights, which means the constitution cannot protect us. I don’t know if there is any better definition of tyranny”. This is the stark warning from Dr Paul Craig Roberts, who was associate editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal and was appointed by US president Ronald Reagan as assistant secretary of the treasury for economic policy.
* * *
“The whole world has to isolate this rogue Apartheid genocidal maniac, serial killing, pathologically lying state, isolate it and shame anyone who goes there. Israel is exposed, Zionism is on its last leg and only exists on the weight of its own collapsed propaganda”. A hard-hitting short video from Abby Martin via Double Down News.
* * *
“The Problem with Anti-Zionists”. In this interview with Propaganda & Co, Dr Rahmeh Aladwan explains how sensibilities with regard to Jewish anti-genocide allies are stopping people from spelling out the true nature of the supremacist enemy.
* * *
“While we, brothers in blood and faith, are killing each other, our commanders on both sides of the front speak in Hebrew. I am glad that the world has already understood that in Kiev the power is controlled by the Zionists. But I am sorry that very few have yet realized that in Moscow the power is also in the hands of the Zionists”. A crucial insight from the late Alexey Mozgovoy on the reality behind the Russia-Ukraine conflict, as cited by Iurie Rosca.
* * *
Israeli and Zionist interests – the “Epstein Network” – are deeply enmeshed in the surveillance-state totalitarianism rapidly being rolled out in the USA, points out Whitney Webb in an interview with Chris Hedges.
* * *
“To fully liberate ourselves from this slave system, we have to wake others to see it too. If most everyone understood that we were born into a slave system run by psychopaths, I am pretty sure that the system would collapse. I believe that the monsters running the system know this, they see a lot of people waking up and this is why they are building a digital prison around us now”. Binky La Rue hits the nail on the head.
* * *
“Any Conspiracy pundit who studiously avoids any of the antis in this list may well be a Pied Piper, whether they know it or not. You must be: Anti-imperialist; anti-colonialist; anti-System; anti-Establishment; anti New World Order; anti-Multipolar World Order; anti-UN; anti-Sustainability agenda; anti-Zionist; anti-Covidian; anti-Pandemic ‘awareness’; anti-medical coercion of any kind; anti-Left/Right Punch and Judy show; anti-Climate Alarmism; anti-Geoengineering; anti Digital ID; anti-CBDCs and all crypto currencies; anti-AI; anti-Fourth Industrial Revolution; anti-all political parties…” Rusere Shoniwa looks at the dangers of certain kinds of limited “opposition”.
* * *
“A criminal group has long been ferrying children from Ukraine to Great Britain where they get into the hands of pedophiles, high-placed representatives of the British establishment”. This is the claim from Vasily Prozorov, former Lieutenant Colonel in Ukrainian intelligence – and who would be surprised if it were true?
* * *
“As China’s government and Chinese corporations are very much part of the global public-private partnership, its institutional innovations are moving us all closer to the UN’s sought-after smart city-state world”. A reminder from Iain Davis that globalism really is global and that the “multi-polar” option is a sham.
* * *
James Corbett conducts a fascinating interview on what goes on behind the scenes at Wikipedia with its co-founder Larry Sanger, who has now been definitively banned from involvement with the site because of his criticism of its pro-system bias. Sanger’s Encyclosphere site is worth a look.
* * *
“British taxpayers – not the monarchy – remained on the hook for at least 175 years for the loans that the British government took out to fund the £20 million compensation paid to enslavers. Taxpayers didn’t finish paying off these loans – worth billions in today’s money — until 2015”. Fascinating insights into the British state’s involvement in the slave trade from Edward Spannaus.
* * *
“The need to create, dominate, and control, or to increase desire and pleasure either through domination or modern rituals such as consumer culture necessitating excess resource extraction, did not exist in organic societies”. Useful analysis from Harvey Kropotkin.
* * *
“Being against the system doesn’t just mean engaging in reactive activity to events. It’s also about showing the kind of world we want to move towards and fight for. It’s about building the social and community structures we need, so that when revolution does come, we have the foundations ready for the new world we want”. As usual, we very much agree with Dave Amis of The Avon Stirrer.
* * *
“The great ability of those who are in control in the modern world lies in making the people believe that they are governing themselves”.
(For many more like this, see the Winter Oak quotes for the day blog)
If you like this bulletin please tell others about it. Subscribe to Winter Oak by clicking the “follow” button.
—–
Back Issues
Follow Winter Oak on X at @WinterOakPress
winter oak 
The article on British taxpayers being in debt to the slave owners for 175 years omitted two important and little known facts…
The loan was repaid to Nathan Mayer Rothschild and his partner Moses Montefiore who never actually provided any actual real ‘money’ to the British State. It was fictional credit created from nothing.
Secondly, the greatest ‘compensation’ pay out to a slaver went to the family of the British Prime Minister William Gladstone.
A fraud and crime of breathtaking proportions.
LikeLike
That’s interesting, thanks. Could you point me to an essay or book going into all that in more detail?
LikeLike