Number 88
- China is globalist
- BRICS and the bankers
- Gaza: manufacturing consent for slaughter
- Leopold Kohr: an organic radical inspiration
- Acorninfo
It seems that a lot of people out there are still in denial regarding the extent to which China is part of the same global-governance monopoly that has long owned the West.
With that in mind, we have brought together some material published here at Winter Oak over the last few years that might shed (evidently much-needed) light on the situation.
In January 2021 our five-part series of articles on the World Economic Forum’s Global Shapers Community focused on the Beijing hub of Klaus Schwab’s top-down pseudo-network.
One hub member is Eric Tse, a young Big Pharma billionaire who is from Hong Kong, but is said to have “close ties” with “mainland Chinese politicians” – his father Tse Ping was previously a committee member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), the country’s top political advisory body.
On December 7, 2020, Tse’s Sino Biopharmaceutical invested $515 million in Sinovac, the company behind the CoronaVac vaccine.
Tse is also part of the WEF Global Shapers worldwide leadership, as we explained here.
On October 1 2019, the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, Tse was able to attend Communist Party celebrations in Beijing open only to invited guests and dignitaries.
We commented at the time: “So we have a Big Pharma billionaire, who is working with the WEF to push for yet more global corporate control and exploitation, celebrating the founding of a communist state!”
In March 2022 our special correspondent Najm Al-Dīn wrote of the Russia-Ukraine conflict: “This war marks a major inflection point in the globalist aspiration for a new international rules based order anchored in Eurasia.
“While America tries desperately to cling to its superpower status, China’s economic ascent and Russia’s regional ambitions threaten to upend the strategic axial points of Eurasia (Western Europe and Asia Pacific).
“The region in which America previously enjoyed uncontested hegemony is no longer impervious to cracks and we may be witnessing a changing of the guard which dramatically alters the calculus of global force projection.
“Although China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has the potential to unify the world-island (Asia, Africa and Europe) and cause a tectonic shift in the locus of global power, the recent invasion of Ukraine will have far-reaching consequences for China-Europe rail freight.
“The Ukrainian President Zelensky claimed that Ukraine could function as the BRI’s gateway to Europe”.
Turning to the China-Israel connection, he wrote: “Israel is a highly attractive BRI market for China and the CCP is acutely aware of Israel’s importance as a strategic outpost connecting the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea through the Gulf of Suez.
“Furthermore, the Chinese government has for many years acknowledged the primacy of Israel as a global technology hub and capitalised on Israel’s innovation capabilities to help meet its own strategic challenges”.
An intriguing snippet of information dropped into our hands in January 2023, while we were researching a story about the global chemical and tobacco industries.
We wrote: “It appears that virtually everything, everywhere, is owned by an interlocking knot of funds and holding companies centred around BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard”.
And this turned out even to be true of a company owned by “communist” China.
“China Tobacco is owned by the Chinese state, operated by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China, enjoys a virtual monopoly in China, which accounts for roughly 40% of the world’s total consumption of cigarettes, and is the world’s largest manufacturer of tobacco products measured by revenues.
“But top institutional shareholders in its Hong Kong entity, China Tobacco International (HK) Company Limited, include no fewer than three manifestations of Vanguard!”
Our July 2023 article on BRICS provided some historical background on China’s connections to the arch-globalist Rothschild empire.
“The dynasty’s obvious power in Chinese affairs was such that when the British magazine The Period published, in 1870, a cartoon depicting Lionel Rothschild as ‘The Modern Croesus’, a new Rothschild ‘king’ upon his throne of cash and bonds, one of the lesser rulers he was shown lording it over was the Emperor of China.
“In the light of today’s talk of a ‘multi-polar’ world order, it is interesting to read [Niall] Ferguson’s comment that the Rothschilds favoured ‘co-operation between the European powers’ in China and that they generally preferred ‘what might be called multinational imperialism’”.
Turning to the current situation, we noted that, in 2022, WEF founder Klaus Schwab told Chinese state media that the country was a “role model” for other nations and praised its “tremendous” economic achievements over the last 40 years.
When China reinvented itself as a ‘socialist market economy’ in the late 20th century, it first opened up the country to foreign investment and then privatized and contracted out much state-owned industry.
Addressing the WEF’s 14th Annual Meeting of the New Champions in Tianjin, China, in June 2023, Chinese premier Li Qiang said: “China is committed to building world peace, promoting global development and upholding the international order.
“Today, the Chinese economy is deeply integrated into the world economy. China has developed itself by embracing globalization, and grown into a most staunch force for globalization”.
Our article added: “What the financial forces behind the WEF like about Chinese-style Communism, and liked about Soviet Communism, Italian Fascism and German Nazism, is that authoritarian one-party control frees them from the constraints and complications of public accountability”.
As Iurie Roșca noted in May 2023: “Currently China is the golden dream of any dictator in history, with forced medicine, lockdown and incarceration of its own citizens in their homes, widespread surveillance, social rating and no political and civil liberties whatsoever”.
In September 2023, The Acorn featured a report from our friends at Corporate Watch UK, which we entitled “China: a SAFE bet for global finance”.
This investigated SAFE Investment Company Ltd, one of China’s sovereign wealth funds, and reported: “SAFE began buying into major global firms during the 2007-8 financial crisis. Among the companies it began investing in at this time was BP; by 2008 it had upped its share in the company to a potential $2bn (£1.6bn).
“Its shares in Shell and BP represent the company’s most valuable holdings, currently amounting to around £1.8bn and £1.2bn respectively. Besides these British oil giants, UK companies feature prominently among SAFE’s top public investments.
“These include pharmaceutical companies, AstraZeneca and GSK, and mining behemoths Anglo American and Rio Tinto. It invests in Yara, among the world’s largest producer of fertiliser (see Corporate Watch’s profile on Yara and its role in climate chaos). These holdings are followed by a host of major Western brands, from Tesco and Lloyds Bank, to Burberry, Next, Whitbread and Compass Group.
“It owns 0.47% of the UK’s National Grid – a holding currently worth £198m – and even has a stake in the London Stock Exchange”.
Further insights into China’s role in global governance emerged in our October 2023 research on the China Institute in Shanghai, whose “senior fellows” include self-proclaimed anti-globalist Alexandr Dugin and Martin Jacques, former Marxism Today editor and author of a book called When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order.
China Institute director Zhang Weiwei is a WEF collaborator and very keen on Klaus Schwab’s Fourth Industrial Revolution.
One colleague, Li Bo, is involved with the Tricontinental Institute, “an organisation which received $12.5-million from the Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fund”.
Another, Eric X Li, is a Fellow of the Aspen Institute, an organisation which teamed up with the Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth to host the 2021 Global Inclusive Growth Summit, and a member of the council of the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a globalist body whose funders include NATO, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the UK Ministry of Defence, the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British Army, the Canadian Department of Defence, the Carnegie Corporation, BAE Systems, GKN Aerospace, the Embassy of Israel to the UK, the Kingdom of Bahrain and The Nicky Oppenheimer Foundation.
It’s perhaps understandable, in these dark times, that some people cling to the hope that Chinese power represents something other than imperialist “business as usual”.
But they are only going to make matters worse, in the long run, if they stick their heads into the sand and try to pretend, in the face of all the evidence, that “communist” China isn’t just another front for the global criminocracy.
The same kind of part-time “anti-imperialists” who cheerlead the Chinese empire are also very defensive about the “alternative” BRICS world order we have previously exposed on this site.
One argument that sometimes crops up is that the World Bank is not involved with BRICS, so it is clearly something different from the familiar West-based financial empire.
However, this is simply not true, as revealed by the October 13 2023 “Statement of the Heads of Multilateral Development Banks Group”, hosted on the website of the Shanghai-based New Development Bank.
The NDB describes itself as “a multilateral development bank established by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) with the purpose of mobilising resources for infrastructure and sustainable development projects in emerging markets and developing countries (EMDCs)”.
The joint statement is entitled “Strengthening Our Collaboration for Greater Impact” – this last word being the usual way in which globalist organisations make a knowing nod to their involvement in the “impact capitalism” project built around the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (see here).
The Multilateral Development Banks issuing the statement are listed as: African Development Bank; Asian Development Bank; Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank; Council of Europe Development Bank; European Bank for Reconstruction and Development; European Investment Bank; Inter-American Development Bank; Islamic Development Bank; New Development Bank and, wait for it… World Bank Group!
They describe their aims as “safeguarding our long-term financial sustainability”, “leveraging development partnerships”, “tracking and reporting climate outcomes” and “boosting private capital mobilization”.
In other words, the usual agenda. Nothing “alternative” here.
The accompanying group shot of a smiling, hand-holding bunch of bankers in front of a sparkly UNSDG-themed decoration nicely sums up the nauseating hypocrisy of a rapacious and usurious Leviathan trying to pass itself off as something “nice”.
As Tom-Oliver Regenauer wrote in a perceptive September 2023 German-language article: “It is difficult to understand why a song of praise for the expansion of the BRICS alliance is often sung, especially in circles critical of NATO and the government – why an autocrat like Putin should be seen as the saviour of the free world, or a brutal dictatorship like China as an acceptable counterpoint to Western hegemonic power.
“Even the imminent introduction of central bank digital currencies (CBDC) in the BRICS countries is being twisted by supporters of the same in such a way that their own worldview does not have to be changed”.
James Corbett has also just issued a timely warning that the “BRICS will save us!” crowd are peddling “a hopium narrative about Putin and Xi saving the world from the very globalist policies that they are working so hard to put into place in their own country”.
It’s time to wise up to the fact that BRICS and the New World Order are one and the same thing.
3. Gaza: manufacturing consent for slaughter
An excerpt from an article by our comrade David Rovics, published on October 28, 2023
Social engineering — the shaping of the narrative and the process of manufacturing consent — can be very successful, despite the easy availability of things like reality-based journalism, if you know where to look for it. Successful social engineering requires that the forces working on manufacturing the consent be the dominant ones, not the only ones. I’ll run through a list of some of the consent-manufacturing social engineering techniques I’ve been hearing constantly from western leaders, across the western media, and from those arguing these lines in one form or another on social media.
– Always strive to start the narrative at the point where Israel can appear to be the victim. Israel has been keeping their walled ghetto in a half-starved, regularly-bombed state for many years now through very intentional policies of collective punishment of the entire civilian population, which is made up largely of refugees driven out of other Palestinian lands. But none of this history matters — everything began on October 7th, 2023 is the direct or tacit message we get in most of the western press and from the vast majority of the elected officials, whether liberal, conservative, or “moderate.”
– When giving background on the foundations of the self-proclaimed Jewish State, focus on the Nazi holocaust, as if the dispossession of Palestine by its indigenous inhabitants and the creation of a new Jewish state there was almost an inevitable consequence of fascism — and therefore anyone opposing the new Jewish state is probably a fascist, too. If you mention the US, British, or German immigration policies that facilitated the Jewish settlement of Palestine during the 1930’s and 1940’s, don’t do this often. Same with any other thorough exploration of the background of the Zionist movement, its colonial nature, or the many massacres of Palestinians and occupations of Palestinian towns that were foundational in the formation of the state of Israel.
– When discussing the history of Palestine/Israel post-1948, always emphasize Israeli victimhood, and how it’s a small “western” country surrounded by hostile, undemocratic, Arab neighbors. Frequently mention the existential crises of the 1967 and 1973 wars, and emphasize the small size of Israel relative to Egypt and Syria. Never contextualize these conflicts as efforts by Arab governments and Arab armies to seek redress for the tremendous injustice of the displacement and permanent exile of over 700,000 Arabs from Arab lands.
– When covering the current conflict, no matter how asymmetrical it obviously is — with one side controlling and regularly bombing any access points to the walled ghetto that is the Gaza Strip, with one side having destroyed half of the standing structures in Gaza, and preventing food, water, and fuel from entering the Strip, with the Palestinian population facing imminent starvation — always remember to contextualize it by mentioning the Hamas attacks of October 7th, and how they killed 1,400 people.
– When it comes to atrocities like intentionally killing civilians, always trust the Israeli authorities’ accounts of what happened in southern Israel on October 7th. If the authorities say the killings of civilians were intentional, believe them and assume they wouldn’t say this if they hadn’t done some kind of thorough investigation and studied the trajectories of all the bullets and tank shells fired by all sides during the course of the fighting. Downplay or disregard accounts from the survivors or anyone else that conflicts with the “human animal” narrative of “modern-day Nazis who want to kill all the Jews.”
– When it comes to the most violent slaughter and starvation of all civilian life in Gaza and apparent intention to destroy every building standing in Gaza, always give emphasis to the Israeli position that these “air strikes” are “targeted” and are aimed at destroying “the Hamas infrastructure of terror” and the “Hamas war machine.” Even if you feel compelled to interview or mention the occasional doctor at one of fifteen hospitals that have been forced to close and leave the thousands of maimed to die horrible deaths or try to operate in a parking lot under fire with no anesthesia, clean water or electricity, make sure to contextualize this interview by spending at least twice as much time soon afterwards focusing on the very legitimate and tragic suffering of the families of those killed or taken hostage in southern Israel.
– As the genocide unfolds with dramatic new developments by the hour involving close to a thousand civilians dying beneath indiscriminate bombardment every 24 hours, Israel refusing visas to UN officials, most of the leaders of the western world showing their continued support for Israel even as it carries out genocide, world leaders holding emergency meetings constantly everywhere, make sure your press coverage does not reflect any of this. Don’t stop your usual programming in order to cover an emergency speech by the Secretary General or an emergency meeting of the General Assembly. The UN is not important, and the fact that the US Secretary of State has basically been living in the Middle East for several weeks now is not an important story, in that it should not change the basic coverage format, which has now returned to normal, with the genocide being a footnote of no more importance than the new Taylor Swift movie or whether or not she’s having a relationship with that football player.
– When talking about October 7th, don’t speculate about how many civilians could have been killed by the overwhelming firepower the Israeli military employed to retake their lost territory. Don’t mention the large numbers of Israeli soldiers killed by Hamas forces, but focus on the civilians. Always assume the worst regarding the civilian deaths, that they were all intentional. Use every detail you can find about October 7th as a means to dehumanize Hamas.
– Never make comparisons between Israeli prisoners and Hamas’s hostages. The fact that Israel regularly arrests Palestinian children and adults and holds them in tortuous conditions, indefinitely, without trial, whenever they want to, is to be mentioned rarely if ever. Emphasize instead that Israel is a democratic country, and therefore there must presumably be some kind of nice democratic process involved with who goes to prison. Hamas, on the other hand, is a terrorist organization with civilian hostages, which is totally different, since it is not a state.
– On the other hand, when it comes to whether the children of Gaza are getting the mass slaughter the western leaders seem to think they deserve, emphasize that Hamas was at one point the party elected to power by Palestinian voters. Support the position of the (far right and openly genocidal) Israeli government, that because they voted for Hamas, they are all Hamas, and are a threat that needs to be eliminated.
– Although Israelis voted in the politicians that have formed the most far right and openly genocidal coalition in the country’s history, when Israeli civilians are killed, always emphasize the senseless tragedy of the deaths. Their situation is apparently totally different from the civilians in Gaza, who are legitimate targets because they live in Gaza.
– When quoting Israeli officials, or western officials parroting them, talking about how sometimes you have to demolish hospitals, apartment blocks, mosques, and churches because Hamas is keeping supplies in tunnels located beneath them, never contextualize these claims by mentioning how so many of these bombings appear to have been totally against international law under any circumstances. If an Israeli or western official says something, it doesn’t need to be contextualized like that.
– Anytime Israeli or western officials talk about Hamas or Hezbollah or the Iranian leadership wanting to “kill all the Jews” or wanting to “wipe out the state of Israel,” never contextualize these statements by explaining that Israel is an ethnonationalist apartheid state ruling largely over land that international law considers to be illegally occupied, where under international law resistance to occupation, including violent resistance, is justified. Always tacitly support any connection between being anti-Israel and anti-Jewish by never contextualizing the basic nature of Israel as undemocratic country running an occupation of the majority of the population it controls, most of whom live under what has now become a truly genocidal military regime.
– Whenever talking about these events, use the right words — the Israelis conduct air strikes, not bombings. It’s a war zone, not a besieged, walled ghetto. Hamas and Israel are warring parties, not the leaders of a ghetto uprising on one side, fighting on the other an occupying power backed by all the money and might of the USA. When Hamas kills civilians it’s mindless, animalistic terrorism, when Israel does it — from the sky, on an apocalyptically larger scale — it’s a principled western army making an honest mistake.
– No matter how horrible or flagrantly illegal or genocidal Israeli policies may be, always make sure to veer the conversation into an exploration of the importance and complexity of Israel “defending itself.” Make sure it’s clear that everything Israel does is always ultimately in “self-defense.”
– When it comes to any violent actions of Palestinians, regardless of the context, however, this is always to be discussed under the category of “terrorism” — never “self-defense.” Palestinians are somehow always the aggressor, despite being the occupied, ghettoized, obviously oppressed party in this relationship, and are basically incapable of “self-defense.”
– On the rare occasions when there are efforts by western leaders or western media to provide real context to the history of the Zionist project, the history of the occupation and ongoing annexation of the Palestinian lands by the state of Israel, make sure to explain it all as part of an “Arab-Israeli conflict” rather than an occupation of Arab land by a settler-colonial project. Talking about the “Arab-Israeli conflict” helps Israel look small, rather than like the party with all the power in the current and historical relationship here.
– Whenever discussing the history of Israel and Palestine, always focus on the Nazi holocaust that caused so many Jews to want to leave Europe, and tie this in with the history of Jewish settlement of Palestine in such a way that suggests an inevitability about this whole process, and some kind of suggestion of a connection between Palestinians and Nazis, despite no historic connections really existing.
See also: Phoney anti-fascists target the real thing
4. Leopold Kohr: an organic radical inspiration
The latest in our series of profiles from the orgrad website.
Leopold Kohr (1909-1994) was an economist and political scientist who inspired many decentralist and degrowth thinkers.
Describing himself as a philosophical anarchist, Kohr criticised the excessive scale of contemporary mass society and pioneered the “small is beautiful” approach later popularised by E.F. Schumacher.
He explained in 1978: “The real conflict of today is between Man and Mass, the Individual and Society, the Citizen and the State, the Big and the Small Community, between David and Goliath”. (1)
Neal Ascherson wrote in an obituary in The Independent that Kohr “belonged to that Austrian-German Jewish emigration of genius during the later 1930s which changed the entire intellectual nature of the world outside Central Europe”. (2)
He added: “Politically, Leopold Kohr was not easy to locate in conventional terms. As a man of the European anti-Fascist Left, he fell under some suspicion during the McCarthyite period in the United States.
“But as his thought developed, his romantic passion for the Italian city-states brought him to a nostalgia for the enlightened patronage of the Renaissance prince; he was always a democrat, but he was intensely critical of mass societies and of mid-20th-century industrialism”. (3)
Kohr explained in the opening sentences of his most famous work, 1957’s The Breakdown of Nations, that he was trying to invent a whole new political philosophy with which to challenge modern society.
He wrote: “As the physicists of our time have tried to elaborate an integrated single theory, capable of explaining not only some but all phenomena of the physical universe, so I have tried on a different plane to develop a single theory through which not only some but all phenomena of the social universe can be reduced to a common denominator. The result is a new and unified political philosophy centering in the theory of size”. (4)
Kohr added that the problem was “always bigness, and only bigness” and that “if the only problem is one of bigness, the only solution must lie in the cutting down of the substances and organisms which have outgrown their natural limits”. (5)
He was critical of the USA and its global empire which pretended not to be an empire at all. He asked: “Why should we, in Washington, feel it a threat to our interests if an allegedly independent Italy should decide to turn communist unless she has actually become a part of our defence system from which we cannot let her go even if we wanted because the only alternative open to her would be to join the defence system of our rival empire?
“However, if Italy lies within our defence system, our own boundaries must lie in Italy. This means that, whatever we may declare, subconsciously and by implication we consider her as one of our dominions, free to choose her own road only within the limits of our pleasure”. (6)
Kohr warned of the noxious effects of “coca-colonization” on European culture and society, remarking that a bottle of Coke, or any other American consumer product “is as formidable a weapon of assimilation as a sword, and even more dangerous… whoever begins to drink of it will, at the last stage of the process, cease to be an Italian, Frenchman, or German, and become, spiritually at least, an American”. (7)
Kirkpatrick Sale explains that Kohr’s political journey began when he was working as a freelance reporter covering the Spanish Revolution of 1936: “From visiting the independent separatist states of Catalonia and Aragon, from seeing how the Spanish anarchists operated small city-states in Alcoy and Caspe, Kohr took away an understanding of the depth of European localism and an appreciation of the virtues of limited, self-contained government”. (8)
He adds that The Breakdown of Nations only ever saw the light of day because its author happened to complain about the lack of publishing possibilities for anarchists to a complete stranger, who happily turned out to be the anarchist publisher Herbert Read.
Kohr worked as an academic for many years in Puerto Rico. His friendship with Welsh nationalist Gwynfor Evans led him to move to Aberystwyth in 1974, to be close to the then-vibrant Welsh independence movement.
He was a regular contributor to Resurgence, the ecological review founded by John Papworth in 1966, which merged with The Ecologist in 2012.
Video links: Leopold Kohr. Small is Beautiful (45 secs), Philosophische Erinnerung: 18 Jahre nach dem Tod von Leopold Kohr (16 mins).
1. Leopold Kohr, ‘Afterword’, The Breakdown of Nations (New York, E.P. Dutton, 1978), http://www.ditext.com/kohr/
2. Neal Ascherson, ‘Obituary: Professor Leopold Kohr’, The Independent, London, March 1, 1994 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituary-professor-leopold-kohr-1426254.html
3. Ibid.
4. Leopold Kohr, ‘Introduction’, The Breakdown of Nations.
5. Ibid.
6. Leopold Kohr, ‘The American Empire’, The Breakdown of Nations.
7. Ibid.
8. Kirkpatrick Sale, ‘Foreword’, The Breakdown of Nations.
Much consternation in low places was caused by the election victory in Slovakia of Robert Fico’s “leftist-populist” Smer party, which had pledged to stop sending aid to Ukraine. An outraged commentator in The Daily Telegraph, Anton Spisak, complained that Fico (pictured) had won popularity by challenging Covid lockdown policies and siding with Russia against the EU. “What this election has, ultimately, shown is a dividing line between voters that find comfort in the politics of resentment and younger generations that are pro-European and yearning for change”. And who is Spisak? “A senior fellow at the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change”!
* * *
“If Brent knew anything about the history of the term ‘conspiracy theorist’, which apparently he doesn’t, he’d understand that ‘conspiracy theory’ is nothing more than a propaganda label used by the Establishment to discredit anyone who questions power”. Iain Davies exposes Brent Lee, a “former conspiracy theorist” turned thought-cop.
* * *
“I remember how the Western world ‘stood with America’. I remember how we declared a ‘Global War on Terror’, how we ‘took the gloves off’, both at home and abroad, how the government and the media whipped the public up into a bloodthirsty, jingoistic frenzy”. C.J. Hopkins see echoes of 2001 in calls for people to “stand with Israel”.
* * *
“Creating a culture of fear, making people afraid to express themselves or their political opinions, is just one of the many things that Covid, Ukraine, Climate Change and now Israel have in common”. So writes Kit Knightly of OffGuardian in a piece explaining how the Israel-Hamas war is pushing the Great Reset agenda.
* * *
An interesting video interview of former British MP Chris Williamson by Mike Robinson and Vanessa Beeley of UK Column explores the subversion of real democracy by the Israel lobby, the military-industrial complex and the “deep state”.
* * *
Our friends at Real Left are holding a meeting on ‘The Fallout of Lockdowns on the Global South’ in the evening of Friday 10th November at Angel Church, Islington, London, UK. The event is organised in collaboration with Toby Green, Professor of Precolonial and Lusophone African History and Culture at Kings College London, and co-author of The Covid Consensus: The Global Assault on Democracy and the Poor – A Critique From the Left.
* * *
A great 20-minute video of W.D. James’ Winter Oak article The Mortal God Drops Its Mask has been made by Dr Sam Bailey in New Zealand.
* * *
Winter Oak’s Paul Cudenec returned to TNT radio on October 10, 2023, to discuss with Rick Munn his latest collection of essays, Converging Against the Criminocrats.
* * *
“I think there are processes in motion that are trying to create a generation of young people who, in 10-15 years’ time, will accept what the cabal, the so-called elite, plan for us, without much fuss. And that would be a purely technocratic, managerial, handling of the population”. British sociologist Garry Robson, based in Poland, talks to Alex Thomson about the Great Reset in this 15-minute video.
* * *
An impressive video of dissident Margaret Anna Alice’s poem Anatomy of a Philanthropath has been produced by Visceral Adventure. “A philanthropath doesn’t want Us to realize We outnumber Them”.
* * *
“Centralisation is mainly an idea of order; decentralisation, one of freedom”” – E.F. Schumacher
(For many more like this, see the Winter Oak quotes for the day blog)
If you like this bulletin please tell others about it. Subscribe by clicking the “follow” button.
—–
Back Issues
Follow Winter Oak on Twitter at @WinterOakPress
winter oak 
To my mind, These wars are being employed to further the aims of the WEF of the total destruction and genocide they require amongst the worldâs populations. There is no other explanation required. Mike
Sent from Mail for Windows
LikeLike