Number 106
- The Occupation
- Digital tyranny at the door
- What the Sustainable Development Goals really mean for humanity
- Never Again/Never
- Rabindranath Tagore: an organic radical inspiration
- Acorninfo
by Paul Cudenec (who reads the article here)
A lot of very clever people – economists, historians, sociologists and so on – spend their lives devising very clever theories about why our society is the way it is today.
But none of their analysis will ever get anywhere near to the truth if it ignores the forbidden insight that our societies are under occupation by a hostile external power.
Over the last few years I have demonstrated in undeniable and interlocking detail that we are now under the full-spectrum domination of what I first called the global criminocracy but have more lately been terming the zio-satanic imperialist mafia.
Everywhere that I have looked – from the Rockefeller Foundation to the WEF, from UNESCO to BRICS, from Nazism to Communism – I have found irrefutable evidence of control by ZIM and its judeo-supremacist networks.
Taking a step back from the detail, I would now like to provide an overview of how I see The Occupation as functioning.
i. Hiding its own existence
It is extremely important for ZIM that people do not know that its Occupation exists.
This is because only 0.2% of the world’s population is even Jewish – let alone Jewish supremacist (Zionist) – and obviously the remaining 99.8% (minus Christian Zionists but plus anti-Zionist Jews) would not consent to ZIM’s domination of their lives if they knew about it.
While various people will inevitably become aware of, and oppose, various aspects of The Occupation, it is crucial for ZIM that:
a. These people do not become aware of ZIM’s overall existence and role.
b. They do not unite with others opposed to different aspects of its activities in order to resist The Occupation as a whole.
Because ZIM controls the world’s money supply and thus has unlimited amounts of cash to throw around, via its vast labyrinthine network of banks, businesses, foundations, institutions, “think tanks” and NGOs, it has taken control of academia and publishing so as to create and maintain a falsified version of history that totally ignores its Occupation.
It also owns pretty much all the mainstream media and so any full exposure of its existence and activities can be prevented from achieving mass circulation.
But even if journalists were not kept in rein by the owners of their outlets, via their managers, they still probably would never refer to The Occupation.
This is because powerful taboos have been carefully erected to make people reluctant to even consider the existence of The Occupation, let alone talk or write about it.
This is partly a moral taboo in that anyone even hinting at the existence of The Occupation is regarded as a Bad Person – an “anti-semite” or a “Nazi”.
But it is also an intellectual taboo in that it is considered dim-witted and simplistic to identify one single tightly-knit criminal group as wielding global power.
The gullibility of those who swallow the official narrative is flipped around and projected on to those who “fall for” so-called “conspiracy theories”, particularly if these remind people of documents that have previously been shown to be forgeries (and which may well have been manufactured for that very discrediting purpose!).
Censorship is also used to silence exposure of The Occupation, with social media increasingly regarded as a major threat by our global overlords.
If taboos and censorship prove insufficient to prevent people from pointing a finger at The Occupation, the next line of defence is activated – ZIM’s agents (sayanim) go on the offensive and attack the person involved.
This may be invisibly, by the use of whispering campaigns to isolate the individual, or openly, by public denunciations of their “anti-semitism”.
If they are in paid employment, sayanim will be dispatched to launch complaints against them and seek to have them fired.
We have seen a lot of this in recent years, as the Gaza Genocide makes it impossible for many people of conscience to remain silent.
In the UK, for instance, academic David Miller and doctors Rahmeh Aladwan and Ellen Kriesels have been targeted in this way for calling out Jewish supremacism.
The next stage after that is legal warfare, whether in the form of private prosecutions or charges of “hate crime” made by occupied states, fronted by puppet “leaders” (in fact actors) more or less acceptable to the population in question.
As awareness of the reality of The Occupation spreads, ZIM’s agents are drawing up plans not just for more censorship of opinions and revelations that they consider a danger to their domination, but also for new laws to criminalise dissent.
ii. Misrepresenting The Occupation’s impact
An important historical achievement of The Occupation has been to distort – indeed to invert – general understanding of its impact on our lives.
Its activities in fact amount to pillage and plunder, desecration and destruction, exploitation and enslavement.
It regards human beings and nature alike as nothing but resources which it can use to increase its own wealth and power.
But it has managed to depict this horrific process, which has ripped a hole in the heart of humanity and our sacred world, as a positive thing!
We are taught to regard the relentless and disastrous deterioration in the quality of our lives as “progress”, an inevitable step on a marvellous journey to some ill-defined industrial utopia.
The crumbs of convenience and comfort meant to compensate us for the loss of free and healthy lives are elevated to the status of supreme benefits, inalienable rights even, which nobody in their right mind could wish to remove.
The construction of this myth of goodness around its industrial pillaging allows The Occupation to again paint any critics of the process as morally bad, as blockers and impeders of humankind’s self-fulfilment.
Having rendered us helplessly dependent on its demonic Technik, it likes to claim that life outside its industrial prison would be literally impossible, regardless of the fact that our ancestors lived and flourished in that way for hundreds of thousands of years.
iii. Imposing a system.
The Occupation’s ongoing exploitation and enslavement is not carried out in a spontaneous and haphazard manner, but according to an intergenerational Big Plan.
This involves ensuring that the infrastructure and mechanisms of the process are deeply embedded in the administration of the occupied societies, to the extent that they sit beyond the reach of democratic challenge or debate.
Founded on the lie that “economic growth” (the expansion of its own wealth and power) is a good and necessary thing, The Occupation has ensured that this “development” has become the backbone of our collective purpose, the “need” for which is written into the rules by which our societies operate.
I myself have written about The Occupation’s “modernisation” and “planning” machine, of which the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, and their insidious impact slavery project, are merely the latest phase.
And for expert and detailed analysis of how this all-pervading systematic control has been set up, I heartily recommend the Escapekey blog.
iv. Destroying indigenous culture
The first task of any colonial force is to destroy the culture of the occupied people. Their sense of identity has to be shattered, their shared references destroyed, their awareness of having something important to defend ripped away from them.
The Occupation’s cultural war entails pouring derision on all that is authentic, traditional and grassroots – the promotion of generational splits has proved highly useful in that respect.
Feelings, social preferences, ethical stances and spiritualities belonging to the occupied population are systematically marginalised.
Through its control of centralised culture and communication, The Occupation seeks to replace these with an outlook conducive to its own agenda.
However, because indigenous ways of thinking and feeling are innate, they keep resurfacing with each new generation and The Occupation has to constantly reinforce its cultural indoctrination.
Every people, in every generation, throws up spokesmen and spokeswomen, bearers and renewers of its culture and its thinking.
The Occupation will do all it can to either corrupt or suppress these voices.
It does not want the indigenous population to follow its own moral compass, its own values, its own aesthetics, its own collective heart.
So it promotes and imposes its own “cultural” leaders, its own art and music, its own philosophers and ideologues, even its own “dissidents” and “rebels”.
These are the only people anybody has heard of. You choose your own personal favourites from amongst them.
Anybody outside The Occupation’s cultural convoy is deemed not to exist.
v. Resorting to sheer violence
In the last few years, and especially the last few months, there have been encouraging signs that all of this is not working as it used to.
Thanks to Covid and then Gaza, increasing numbers of people are noticing that they are living under The Occupation and daring to say so.
But when the natives get restless, colonial powers know only one response – they deploy sheer force to put us back in our place.
Violence has always been an essential part of The Occupation, alongside all the propaganda and gaslighting.
Whenever we see images of riot cops weighing into protesters protecting the countryside from destruction, calling for justice and freedom, or opposing genocide, we are watching the mercenary thugs of the colonial Occupation in action.
The Occupation loves violence, in fact.
It revels in the mass bloodshed of its manufactured wars and its false-flag terror attacks.
And we all know that it would not hesitate to launch a third world war to dispel growing opposition to its rule and to “reset” the world for the next phase of its Big Plan.
We also know that it would have no moral qualms in switching everywhere to the totalitarian mode of governance which it used in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia.
We can well imagine the dawn raids, show trials and Gulags it could happily unleash against its opponents.
But if and when it feels forced to do so, this will mark a new phase in history.
The Occupation will have become visible to everyone.
The reality of its venal domination will be there for all to see.
And, as I noted at the start of this piece, this is the very last thing that The Occupation can allow to happen…
2. Digital tyranny at the door
The totalitarianism of the Covid years was starting to fade in some people’s memories, as life in the UK and elsewhere seemed to go back to “normal”.
But then, in 2025, the British state announced it was about to impose “mandatory” digital ID on the population, without which they would not be able to work.
The arrogant duplicity behind the roll-out has been jaw-dropping.
The name “Britcard”, for instance, is meant to resonate with feelings of national pride and suggest that it is all about proving how British you are in the face of all those illegal immigrants that somehow keep sneaking into the country.
But the authorities are laughing in the faces of what they consider to be a hopelessly gullible public – the “Brit” in fact stands for “Biometric Registration Identification Tracking”, it would seem.
And it is not the specific British response to a specific British problem that it is being sold as.
As Jason Bassler points out, new digital ID laws have been lined up and pushed through all across the world in the last three months, from Mexico to Thailand, from Switzerland to Papua New Guinea.
When we also consider that digital ID forms a central plank of the WEF’s global-control agenda, it becomes all too clear what is happening here.
The Covid scam was just the starting pistol for a worldwide transition from pseudo-democratic into full-out techno-totalitarian mode, the process hailed in 2020 by both Klaus Schwab and “King” Charles as The Great Reset.
Oracle Films comments: “Through initiatives like the Digital Impact Alliance, the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and the United Nations, along with partners such as USAID and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office are building the digital identity infrastructure.
“The Gates Foundation has committed $200 million to ‘Digital Public Infrastructure’ (DPI) focusing on systems like MOSIP (Modular Open Source Identity Platform), adopted by 11 countries.
“US tech giant Oracle runs more than half of the UK central government’s financial and planning software, including the Department for Work & Pensions, Ministry of Justice, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, Cabinet Office, Home Office, HM Treasury, and Ministry of Defence.
“In summary then: the big foundations are building the digital identity infrastructure. Palantir provides the surveillance and enforcement capabilities. The WEF, now led by BlackRock’s Larry Fink, coordinates the global governance framework”.
We pointed to the identity of those behind this latest assault on our freedom in our June 2025 article “BritCard: a passport to digital slavery“.
Both Keir Starmer, whose government has been tasked with imposing digital ID on the British people, and Tony Blair, who has been pushing for it for decades, are notoriously close to the Rothschilds and their zio-satanic imperialist mafia.
Investigative journalist Jody McIntyre has since underlined this reality with an excellent series of X threads.
He writes: “The war criminal Blair is the architect of Britcard. His rise to power was bankrolled by Michael Levy, later nicknamed ‘Lord Cashpoint’. Levy raised over £100 million for Labour. And Blair first met Levy at a dinner party hosted by Israeli embassy officer Gideon Meir”.
These genocidal zio-monsters care nothing for the British people and their opinions.
So it was that when 2.7 million people signed an online petition calling for the digital ID scheme to be halted, the occupied state’s response was to state baldly that, no, it would be going ahead.
In the face of such blatant contempt, one can only hope that the people of Britain stand firm by refusing to comply and by coming together in numbers to reject the path to digital tyranny.
Calling for a mass non-compliance protest at Marble Arch, central London, from 1pm on Saturday October 18, freedom campaigner Fiona Rose Diamond warns: “Imagine a life lived under relentless surveillance, permissioned gateways, systems that log, rank & revoke.
“One switch could cut your pay, your care, your travel, your voice. Their goal is simple: total control”.
3. What the Sustainable Development Goals really mean for humanity
- Zero Poverty
UBI’s, Centralised Banking, IMF / World Bank, CBDC’s - Zero Hunger
Fake Meat, GMO’s, Eat Insects - Good Health/Well-being
Mass Injections, “Vaccine Passports” , Codex Alimentarius, Masks, State monitoring, Limit or eliminate access to natural remedies - Good Education
State controlled propaganda from birth. Ignorance of basic information to support independence from the system - Gender Equality
Transgenderism, Population Control, Breakdown of the family - Clean Water and Sanitation
State control of water supply and chemicals added (e.g. fluoride) - Affordable and Clean Energy
SMART grid, SMART metres, Peak Pricing, Electric Cars, raising gas/ energy prices, Green Taxes - Decent Work and Economic Growth
Mega-corporations, Crash Economies, Control of means of production , Destroy small businesses-PART 4 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Restrictions on travel, closure of airports, 15 min cities - Reduce Inequality within and between countries
Crash economies, CBDC’S, UBI - Safe + Sustainable Human Settlements + Cities
15 mins cities, ULEZ, Big Brother surveillance, Digital ID’s, 5g - Responsible Consumption and Production
Limits on consumption (including via CBDC’s), Taxes - Stop Climate Change
Climate Lockdowns, carbon taxes, control via CBDC’S, control on travel - Sustainable Use of Life Below Water
Control of oceans + mineral rights, GMO’S - Sustainable Use of Life On Land
Control of land + mineral rights, GMO’S - Peace, Justice, Inclusion and Strong Institutions
Remove rights of individual, use of CBDC’s, “Online Safety Bills”, Hate Speech Laws, Social isolation - Global Partnerships
Remove national sovereignty, WEF, Civil Society, Corporatocracy, NGO’s
1 Never Again
We thought we'd always known
what was meant by Never Again
till it was made plain as day that we didn't
and as it turns out we weren't even close.
As it swiftly degraded from sacred admonition
to seriously sickening joke
and world-class-gaslighting slogan
only the blind failed to notice
how of those who basked in the notion
of being god's chosen people
so many seemed yoked to some biblical evil;
failed to notice that to Zionist Jews
Never Again seemed to mean
they could righteously claim
the twisted privilege to cry out in pain
even as their cherished ethnic-cleansing-based
inherently terrorist ethno-supremacist state
was casually engaged in unspeakable evil
as it perpetrated straight-up genocide
not merely without shame and for all to see
but with stunningly undisguised pride
and at times a darker-still soul-searing glee.
Keenly aware that the image of Ultimate Victim
might nicely serve as a stay-out-of-prison ticket
to committing the ultimate crime
it only made sense
that at the malevolence-drenched end of the day
of all cards the H card was the one
the devil had patiently been waiting to play.
2 Never
In light of their staggering talent
for denying deflecting and projecting
— on top of their affinity for all-round duplicity —
never believe the deceivers' words.
Never let them tell you
that you didn't hear what you heard
that what happened never did
and you didn't see what you saw
regardless of how hard they insist
that of all groups of humans they're closest to god.
Believe what was seen was heard and confirmed;
believe what occurred believe what took place;
what witnesses witnessed and reporters recorded
before they were killed by the criminal state
— killed in cold blood for bravely reporting
the undistorted mind-frying facts
to an uncaring world too scared to bear witness
to the hideous acts of an off-the-charts darkness
remorselessly cast by a vast moral sickness.
Never doubt what you saw what you heard;
never doubt what occurred what took place
— the things you saw and heard happened
despite how often they're denied or dismissed
by Zionist liars who lie straight to your face.
Never believe the deceivers
or let the censors tell you what is and what isn't;
what was and wasn't what did and didn't. Never!
And never apologize for telling the truth;
for condemning the methodical slaughter
of demonically traumatized elders and youth
sons and daughters fathers and mothers;
for bearing witness to the psychopathic business
of slaying those blatantly painted
as nothing but sub-human others.
5. Rabindranath Tagore: an organic radical inspiration
The latest in our series of profiles from the organic radicals website.
“India’s best ideas have come where man was in communion with trees and rivers and lakes”
Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941) was a Bengali poet, musician and artist, regarded by some as India’s national poet.
He denounced the British Raj from a universalist, internationalist, anti-imperialist and anti-nationalist position, and advocated independence from Britain.
In ‘The Religion of the Forest’, Tagore wrote about the influence that the forest dwellers of ancient India had on classical Indian literature.
The forests were sources of water and the storehouses of a biodiversity that could teach us the lessons of democracy, he said.
They could show us how to leave space for others while drawing sustenance from the common web of life. Tagore saw unity with nature as the highest stage of human evolution.
In his essay ‘Tapovan’ (‘Forest of Purity’), Tagore wrote: “Indian civilization has been distinctive in locating its source of regeneration, material and intellectual, in the forest, not the city.
“India’s best ideas have come where man was in communion with trees and rivers and lakes, away from the crowds. The peace of the forest has helped the intellectual evolution of man. The culture of the forest has fueled the culture of Indian society.
“The culture that has arisen from the forest has been influenced by the diverse processes of renewal of life, which are always at play in the forest, varying from species to species, from season to season, in sight and sound and smell. The unifying principle of life in diversity, of democratic pluralism, thus became the principle of Indian civilization”. (1)
Vandana Shiva comments: “In Tagore’s writings, the forest was not just the source of knowledge and freedom; it was the source of beauty and joy, of art and aesthetics, of harmony and perfection. It symbolized the universe”. (2)
Video link: Deepak Chopra – Rabindranath Tagore’s Relevance for the Future of Spirituality and of Humanity (56 mins)
1. Vandana Shiva: Everything I Need to Know I Learned in the Forest, Yes! magazine, December 2O12.
https://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/what-would-nature-do/vandana-shiva-everything-i-need-to-know-i-learned-in-the-forest
2. Ibid.
“It is no longer enough in my opinion to say the UK is under the influence of the Zionist movement, it is subsumed”, writes independent journalist Vanessa Beeley. She adds: “The Zionist shadow state is eating the UK from within, consuming ‘democracy’ and trashing the electorate under the crushing wheels of ethno-supremacy and impunity from accountability. The so-called British regime creaks under the weight of its own hegemonic facade while its spawn return to feed on the corpse of any pretensions of humanity”.
* * *
“The Zionist lobby is powerful. Finance, media, culture, medicine, judiciary, they have influence in every corner. They whisper in shadows, smear your name, use policies, regulations, and institutions to destroy you. They rarely confront you face to face”. Podcaster Doc Malik spells out a dire reality that can no longer be ignored, referring to his own personal experience.
* * *
“We have been enslaved. But once the slaves realise that there are more of us than there are of them, inevitably a revolt happens and that’s happening right now”. Candace Owens tells Neil Oliver about the imminent downfall of the zio-satanic imperialist mafia, ZIM.
* * *
“If there’s one issue that can unite the so-called left and right – I think a false dichotomy in the first place but nevertheless people buy into it so I guess it’s real – it is anti-Zionism”. So says Michael Rectenwald, founder of the new Anti-Zionist America Political Action Committee (AZAPAC), in an important interview with Hrvoje Morić of Geopolitics and Empire.
* * *
A very good X thread from GenXGirl provides “a timeline of a sophisticated, well-funded and deliberately opaque influence operation conducted by Israel and its allies within the US to target conservatives”. She continues: “Polling data shows Israel has permanently lost the American left and they are losing the American right, particularly young conservatives. Israel’s campaign seeks to recast criticism of a foreign nation’s policy as a form of bigotry, weaponize faith, and co-opt American institutions, all while systematically evading the laws designed to protect the American public from such foreign propaganda”.
* * *
“We were supposed to think it was a friendly meal with Charlie Kirk – it actually turned out Charlie Kirk was getting screamed at by Zionist maniacs frothing at the mouth about his shifting views”. Max Blumenthal in an interview with Nima R. Alkhorshid.
* * *
In the face of continuing public outrage at the Gaza Genocide, the ZIM-controlled British state has announced new policing laws aimed at criminalising protests of which it does not approve. The Ministry of Truth, aka the Home Office, announced on Sunday October 5 2025: “The right to protest must be protected. But repeated large protests are leaving communities feeling unsafe. This cannot continue. Police will have new powers to instruct organisers to hold events elsewhere or risk arrest – protecting communities and police resources”. War is peace, genocide is self-defence and banning protests is protecting the right to protest!
* * *
ZIM’s total control of UK politics is not, of course, confined to Keir Starmer’s ruling Labour Party. At the “opposition” Conservative Party’s conference, leader Kemi Badenoch delivered what Brian Gerrish described on Monday October 6, in a particularly excellent episode of UK Column News, as a “lecture” in support of Zionism. Badenoch declared that “extremism has gone unchecked” and, almost unbelievably, added: “You see it manifest in the shameful behaviour on the streets of our cities, protests which are in fact carnivals of hatred directed at the Jewish homeland”.
* * *
“From Rome to Milan, Bologna to Genoa, Livorno to Naples, Turin to Florence, Bari to Palermo, and over 60 more cities across Italy — workers are massively rising in solidarity with Palestine, demanding an immediate end to Israel’s genocide in Gaza”, declared one X post. The Italian public’s response to Israel’s war crimes has been highly impressive, not least the evolution of the popular chant of siamo tutti antifascisti into siamo tutti antisionisti. Anti-Fascism is, today, necessarily anti-Zionist.
* * *
“I grew up in The Netherlands” writes Mouin Rabbani. “During my youth it was easily the most pro-Israeli country in Europe. Yet on Sunday, as confirmed by the police, a quarter of a million Dutch citizens, of all backgrounds, of all stripes and colours, turned out to draw a ‘Red Line’ against the Gaza Genocide. I never anticipated I would witness such scenes during my lifetime, and am genuinely humbled. Israel has irreversibly lost the Dutch public, and future Dutch governments will find it increasingly difficult to hold the line on behalf of the genocidal apartheid regime. We are living in a different world, and it will become a better one”.
* * *
“We all need to make some small, personal sacrifices and changes in our lives, so that we are no longer serving or supporting the state and its corporate and banking masters, in as many ways as we can manage, as soon as we can”. Some good advice from The Light paper as it urges us to say no to the digital prison camp into which we are being herded.
* * *
Rusere Shoniwa has written an interesting essay about the importance of individual freedom within any healthy functioning community, arguing that if we all insisted on just two human rights – bodily autonomy and privacy – “we could reject the New World Order”.
* * *
“The ‘logic of production’ is neither the logic of life nor that of society. It is a small and subservient part of both. The destructive forces unleashed by it cannot be brought under control, unless the ‘logic of production’ itself is brought under control – so that destructive forces cease to be unleashed”.
E.F. Schumacher, Small is Beautiful
(For many more like this, see the Winter Oak quotes for the day blog)
If you like this bulletin please tell others about it. Subscribe by clicking the “follow” button.
—–
Back Issues
Follow Winter Oak on Twitter at @WinterOakPress
winter oak 