by Mees Baaijen
Abstract
This article, the second in a series, provides an overview of the manipulations that led to the incorporation of the former Chinese Empire into the global power structure designed by the Global Mafia (or Glafia, i.e. the Predators), the criminal owners of most of the planet’s wealth, governments, corporations and institutions. Many details and references not mentioned here can be found in my book The Predators versus The People.
Introduction
Chinese civilization goes back thousands of years and is one of the oldest in the world. It has seen many changes and wars, and someof these wars were certainly not defensive. The same goes for the Great Wall, which in part protected the Empire’s newly annexed territories.
Until the early 1800’s, Asia and especially China, was the dominant player in the world economy and technology (James Petras; Joseph Needham). The ships used in Admiral Zheng’s “charm offensive” in the 15th century to visit India, Arabia, Egypt and Africa were up to 4 times bigger than the European ones. Yet China never colonized the world, probably for philosophical reasons (Confucianism, Taoism) and also because the rest of world had little of interest to offer to China (G. Arrighi).
In the early 19th century, the hidden driving force behind world history in the last 500 years – Glafia – placed China on its list of Eurasian empires to be “normalized”, to provide a “level playfield” for their plan to dominate the whole world. Activities were started to weaken all great Eurasian empires, in the case of China mainly the opium wars and the making of a subordinate (or comprador) elite.
However, for the final conquest of the still highly sovereign empires of Eurasia, a very strong force had to be established: an alliance between Glafia’s already fading but still very powerful British Empire, and its rising American Empire, helped by its European proxy states. That coalition, in which many Zionist proxies also participated, would instigate and execute the World Wars, the communist revolutions in Russia, China and elsewhere, and financial crises.
Indeed, in 1897 Britain and the USA made a secret agreement to carry out the gigantic project to subdue and colonize the whole of Eurasia, China included. This project, which included the setting up of bogeymen Hitler and Mussolini, is here called The Great 20th Century Slaughter of Eurasia. It affected humanity more destructively and on a larger scale than had ever happened in history.
Rockefeller in China
In 1863, John D. Rockefeller (just 24 years old) sold his first (lamp) kerosene in China and made his first “disinterested” gift to China missions. In the usual Rockefeller style, he quickly established a monopoly. At the time, China had been made “the sick man of Asia”, due to the devastating opium wars launched at it by the British Empire. In cahoots with the USA, it forced China to accept opium produced in British India (and not bullion) as payment for its exports of luxuries to the West.
The Rockefellers and their influence would never leave China. Across the 20th century, their “philanthropic” investment in China’s science, medicine, and higher education officially surpassed one billion dollars. Mary Brown Bullock writes:
“Over the course of the 20th century, several hundred Chinese institutions and many thousands of Chinese scholars and practitioners received Rockefeller philanthropic support. Rockefeller philanthropy’s sustained emphasis on science and medicine transformed and secularized the American cultural role in Republican China. It legitimized an American scientific influence and a tradition of intellectual and professional relationships that transcended Mao’s China and continues to distinguish the bilateral relationship.
Rockefeller philanthropic institutions have long served as a bellwether for the American non-governmental presence in China. Their formative influence on China’s science and medicine defined the post-missionary era in the first half of the [20th] century. Their re-entry into China after Nixon’s [1972] opening was carefully orchestrated by China’s leaders.”
Glafia, together with the Rockefellers and other minions, led China’s trajectory from sovereign Empire to global hegemon in three revolutionary steps, which are discussed below.
The first Glafia-led revolution in China: Sun Yat-sen
Japan had been corrupted since the 1860’s by Glafia’s British, and later also American, hegemon (for example through Jacob Schiff’s $200M loan to Japan), to serve as a future battering ram against China and Russia, which started with the 1904-05 Russo-Japanese war. Japan also served as the base for Sun Yat-sen’s overthrow of China’s Qing dynasty in 1912, financed by Wall Street & The City. According to A. Sutton:
“The best-documented example of Wall Street intervention in revolution is the operation of a New York syndicate in the Chinese revolution of 1912, which was led by Sun Yat-sen. Although the final gains of the syndicate remain unclear, the intention and role of the New York financing group are fully documented down to amounts of money, information on affiliated Chinese secret societies, and shipping lists of armaments to be purchased.”
Sun, a Christian who had studied in the USA, wanted to develop China in the same way. But as in the case of Russia, Glafia’s bankers did not, at least not at that time: their plan for the 20th century was to make the USA their new hegemon. China had to be suppressed, by placing it in the “communist fridge”, under Mao Zedong, together with Russia (which had been in the communist fridge since the 1917 Revolution). Never forget that communism was also a Glafia project!
In 1925, Sun Yat-sen was poisoned, probably by the British, and died. Under Chiang Kai-shek and his successors, the Chinese Nationalists were sabotaged by the treasonous Americans, who officially supported them. That’s why, since 1928, they had to govern mainland China from Taiwan. In 1949, the Chinese Communists took over control of the Chinese mainland, and the Nationalists were left with the small island of Taiwan.
Glafia’s second revolution in China: communism
Already by 1919, Mao had been headhunted and earmarked by “Yale in China” school. It was a US intelligence front, in collaboration with members of the Skull and Bones Society at Yale University, which had been founded in the 1830’s by the US Russell family, opium dealers in China. Under the cover of WW2, the USA betrayed China into Communism (see James Perloff), with a treasonous key role for Glafia pawn General George Marshall, America’s wartime commander and name giver to the later Marshall Plan.
Mao received several Glafia advisors, all Jewish, to assist in the creation of a Glafia-desired totalitarian state. After David Rockefeller visited China in 1973 with his faithful agent Henry Kissinger, he was very satisfied about “this” – or should we say “his” – experiment:
“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution … [this] social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history”.
With “whatever the price”, Rockefeller coldly referred to the fact that in the 1950’s and 60’s, Chinese communists slaughtered tens of millions of Chinese non-communists, often people dedicated to Tao. Today’s pro “pacifist, harmonious and Taoist” China and pro “multipolar order” Westerners – like Pepe Escobar and Matthew Ehret – seem to have forgotten this horrible episode.

An important reason for the US hegemon to put China on the communist path was to keep it backward and isolated for several decades, the same “refrigerator” trick as applied earlier on in Russia. That eliminated China and Russia as economic competitors, so the USA, the “great champion of liberty and free trade”, could have a typical, soaring Glafia career. It was also an experiment in the creation of the modern, Glafia-controlled totalitarian Chinese state – which it remains until today. Klaus Schwab and his pupil Justin Trudeau are big fans of present-day Communist China, and they show it on YouTube.
Glafia’s third Chinese revolution: global hegemon
When Glafia’s US hegemon started to prepare their “China hegemon” project in 1971 (a year of great change), that was because:
· Glafia has no loyalty to any nation, religion, race, or ethnicity, and presently they see Communist China (assisted by Russia) as the best global system for their domination project (see also the Yalta Conference during WW2, in which the Allies gave Central Europe and North Korea away to communism).
· China, with well over one billion clever and hardworking people, had by far the largest economic potential – just as it had shown before 1850.
· China was severely humiliated in the 19th century, which it will never forget, and was only going to participate in Glafia’s New World Order as its leader state (as confirmed in this George Soros interview).

In that very same year 1971, the People’s Republic of China, led by the Chinese Communist Party under Mao, was recognized as “the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations”; with support of Glafia’s US hegemon, of course. The representatives of the Republic of China in Taiwan were immediately removed from the UN organization. So again a seed for a future conflict was planted, a trick also used by splitting North and South Vietnam, North and South Korea, and the giveaway of Crimea by Khrushchev.
Forty years ago, Antony Sutton prophesied about the development of China by American corporations. As it turned out, he was right – again:
“Bechtel Corporation has established a new company, Bechtel China, Inc. to handle development, engineering and construction contracts for the Chinese government… It appears that Bechtel is now to play a similar role to that of Detroit-based Albert Kahn Inc., the firm that in 1928 undertook initial studies and planning for the First Five Year Plan in the Soviet Union. By about the year 2000, Communist China will be a “superpower” built by American technology and skill…
And who is to say that the Chinese Communists will not make their peace with Moscow after 2000 and join forces to eliminate the super-super-power, the United States?”
In recent years, it was easy to see how all Western actions against China and Russia – the Ukraine war included – had their unification and reinforcement as main goal. The Pentagon’s 2017 budget was the first driven by Glafia-created bogeymen China and Russia. Yet another Glafia project to upset the global balance of powers is arriving at its harvest time! History shows that the Global Powers have no loyalty to any nation, religion or race, and Glafia-supported China is now simply their best totalitarian and hegemonic model.
This is how countries are used as “pieces on a chessboard upon which is being played out a great game for the domination of the world” (Lord George Curzon, 1859-1925, British politician, Vice Roy of India). Remember that there’s only one player behind the board!

The Great Shift: after 500 years, Glafia goes East
To quickly recap: according to Giovanni Arrighi (1994), the world capitalist system developed in four cycles, each led by a temporary hegemon, respectively Spain, Holland, England, and the United States. Each cycle was divided into three phases:
1. An accumulation phase, through trade (piling up of capital).
2. A phase of industrial expansion.
3. A period of financialization (investment, mostly foreign, of capital), dominated by bankers (the earlier merchants lending out their capital).
This last phase is “burning hot and then fading away”, or as Braudel called it, “a sign of autumn”. In it, not only the finance era runs its final course, but also the leader state itself. The gradual demise of one cycle would become the gradual birth of the next, on an ever grander and more global scale.
For Glafia’s present hegemon, the Arch-Fascist informal empire of the United States of America – officially “the free and democratic USA” – the turning point to autumn can be dated to 1971. When we take the recent developments into account, including the war in Ukraine, there can be no doubt: China, and Russia too, will be the new horses pulling Glafia’s chariot.
This time the move is cleverly being sold by stating that we will go from a bad and disgraced uni-polar world to a good, harmonious and even Taoist multi-polar world. With ALL LANDS now brought under control, and the Global Digital Prison on its way to controlling ALL PEOPLE, that powerful Western-Zionist coalition is no longer needed and is being dismantled.
The “China hegemon” project

Like practically all meteoric careers since the start of the Glafia project around 1500, either of persons, corporations or countries, Communist China’s skyrocketing rise after 1971 was Glafia-made. Glafia’s proxy for this new state-building project was of course its 20th century hegemon, the United States of America. Special roles were given to Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, and members of Yale’s Skull and Bones Society, amongst others as US ambassadors to China.
The US hegemon started the “China hegemon” project overtly in 1971, when the visible part of the preparations took off, with Henry Kissinger’s famous visit. No doubt that secret preparations had started long before (the book The Secret History of America’s First Central Intelligence Agency [OSS] provides evidence of such). To recap, the reasons for this project were:
- Glafia’s core of dynastic families sees Communism – which they themselves launched and helped to establish in Russia, and later in China and elsewhere – as the best control system for their global domination project. Under their guidance (see here for an example), China has become the global leader of the “Digital Prison” project. Many Western leaders criticize it, while omitting to mention that their own countries are covertly implementing the same system.
- China, with far over one billion capable and industrious people, has by far the largest potential for economic capacity – as it had already showed for thousands of years.
- China, which was severely humiliated in the 19th century, was only going to participate in Glafia’s New World Order as its leader. George Soros openly admitted this in 2009 (see George Soros interview).
- The rude, brutish, and ruthless USA, with its constant see-through lies, has on purpose lost its credibility in most parts of the world, while China has been doing its best to gain – and buy! – global popularity.
China wasn’t the USA’s first big-state-making project: it had also managed Russia’s transformation into a communist empire, the Soviet Union. Then, after the Glafia-planned fake de-colonization, it made all the post-WW2 “newly independent” ex-colonies their dependent proxies, via bought and paid for sub-ordinate elites (also called vassals or puppet regimes). And in fact, there’s no difference in how they “made” Israel, the European Union, NATO, Japan as their battering ram in Asia, the 19th century unification of Italy, and also of Germany, et cetera: as always, they bribed and corrupted the political and blueblood elites in those countries, including the mainstream media and academia.
Is China’s new role a reason for HOPE?

Will an era of global peace, prosperity and freedom rise with the proposed multipolar order led by China and Russia?
The answer is: Sorry, but NO, for the five major reasons are given below.
First, the Covid litmus test: China, and Russia too, knew that cheap HCQ and Ivermectin work, as shown on a large scale in China, Uttar Pradesh, Japan. But even so they suppressed their people massively with such crazy measures as mRNA jabs (Russia, not China) and lockdowns.
Second, read General Chi’s chilling speech (The secret speech of General Chi Haotian). Anthony Hall confirmed this is not a forgery. It leaves you wondering what’s really behind China’s big smile.
Third, the criminal Triads, who had a role akin to Freemasons in the West, have since long been in cahoots with the Hong Kong tycoons and the Chinese Communist Party, together forming a “Glafia-subordinate gangster elite”.
Fourth, a shocking 2014 article shows how nearly 22,000 members of China’s communist elite hold secretive offshore companies in British and other tax havens, which makes them highly dependent on Glafia’s banksters. Like all Glafia’s proxies, they can never stray from the agenda, because just as Glafia made them, it can also break them. Yes, that’s “autonomous” China!
An important fifth reason is the money system litmus test. Indeed, the whole multipolar effort will be futile if the present usurious money system, fully under control of Glafia’s banksters, is maintained, as it is totally incompatible with peace, prosperity, sustainability, and freedom.
For many it is difficult to grasp that China is part of this. From The Banking Pirates (p.7):
But the real truth is, that lurking behind the scenes, China is being secretly controlled now by a handful of giant British banks and oligarchical banking families through the City of London Corporation, British offshore tax havens, and through their American branch intermediary banks and asset managers in New York and Washington D.C., the Bank for International Settlements in Basel Switzerland, the International Monetary Fund and World Bank in Washington D.C.
As long as Glafia’s bankers stay in charge of our money system, there will be no “autonomous” China, nor any other “self-reliant” countries or regions, or a “sustainable” world, or a “free” world.
Of course the new Chinese hegemon is sold to the public as a benovolent, and even Taoist country, “on the path to socialism with Chinese characteristics”. Just as the criminal and genocidal American hegemon was always presented as “the great champion of democracy and free trade”!
Only if we can create awareness in lots of people, if we re-discover our strength as miraculous and spiritual human beings, and if we cooperate in an open-minded manner with others seeking the truth, can this gigantic problem be tackled.




It is interesting that the Opium Wars forced a specific item as the “settlement trade good” with which the British made “payment.” The actual ‘cost’ to the British was nothing……….though the opium product offered held some ‘value’ on the street. Today the ‘cost’ to produce the “payment” is zero…and the illiteracy about the monetary unit itself being an item of value brings in several more layers of consequence, further burying the society in horrific effects that most are not getting their heads around.
The basis of the entirety of the claims of ‘ownership’ that capitalist
> companies (Blackrock & Vanguard, Chinese investment groups, etc. whose
> owners are not ever disclosed) make is by way of the system of money.
> In the present system of money the monetary unit magically comes into
> existence as an act of government – Poof! – or as an act of banking –
> also Poof! – and every single interchange activity of the people that
> occurs within this system is thereby subjugated to the banks and/or
> the government. We saw during the ’08 crash (and throughout history)
> for whom the government would use its illiterate magical powers. And
> we also saw in that time frame and now how quickly the banks
> would/will snatch up the ‘collateral’ in the magical illiterate
> process called foreclosure. And still we seem to think that the
> BlackRocks and Vanguards of the world are the problem but that the way
> we do money itself is ok!? How is it that we do not see the system as
> having produced the very players that we are now so concerned about?
> Are we all monetary illiterates? In fact, yes. And THAT must change if
> this perennial problem is going to finally go extinct.
>
> It is our very conceptual basis of what money is and does that is at
> the heart of our troubles. We make the mistake of thinking that the
> unit we use for the measure of value is “value” itself. But how can
> that be? It cannot. So we keep making the mistake of considering the
> unit of acCount to also be one of the items of ‘value’ that we are
> exchanging without realizing that attaching ‘value’ to the unit of
> measure that then fluctuates, systemically and subjectively and
> exponentially, we destabilize the entirety of all the rest of our
> transactional experience.
>
> So, when we establish that the origin of the currency unit coming into
> existence is as a simple function of annotation/bookkeeping of the
> freely initiated and determined economic enterprise of the populace we
> free ourselves and our economics from the mistake that currency
> units/units of acCount can be things of value all by themselves. AND
> we free ourselves of the BlackRock and Vanguard phenomena.
>
> Just like we do not see a market in inches vs millimeters we also know
> that there is no magical inch or millimeter creator that must create
> the units before we can measure the length of things! What we have
> done in our own governance is establish the specifications for the
> measurement of length with these unit standards. But we have not yet
> done so with the unit we are attempting to use as a standard abstract
> unit of representation of this thing called value.
>
> Money itself must be understood as a unit of measure….and no one
> ‘creates’ units for this purpose…..the governance of and by a free
> populace defines and specifies the reference criteria for the unit so
> that any and all can freely and reliably use it for the
> representational purpose it serves. The role of government then is NOT
> in unit creation (or in handing this illiteracy off to banks) but is
> in regulation and adjudication of the consistent use of this tool
> across the society. del Mar puts it like this: “When money shall be
> recognized in the law, when it is defined, when its volume, magnitude,
> dimensions, limits are set forth as precisely, fixed as unchangeably,
> and protected as securely from alteration, as are now the dimensions
> of the yard-stick, the pint-pot, and the pound-weight, then, and then
> only, will money perfectly resemble other measures; for then only will
> it become a concrete thing of known dimensions. When this comes to
> pass, Aristotle’s definition of its function will resume its original
> correctness, and money will be as fit in fact, as it is now only in
> theory, to measure the relation called value.” Alexander del Mar, The
> Science of Money (1885)
>
> Marc Gauvin points out that a valid definition that is unequivocal is
> missing so far in human history. Former President of the FR Bank in
> Minnesota, Kocherlakota, proves the current definitions to be
> “vacuous” and asserts that the function of money is as a unit of
> measure/bookkeeping.
>
> In Kocherlakota’s words:
>
> “My argument demonstrates the vacuity of the three standard
> explanations of the role of fiat money in an economy: money acts as a
> store of value, a medium of exchange, and a unit of account….The
> traditional explanations for the presence of money in an economy are
> more descriptive of its functions than explanatory. The true
> explanation for money’s presence is that money is a record-keeping
> device.”
>
> https://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/qr/qr2231.pdf [47] (pages 2-3)
>
>
> So, you can see that at the core conceptual level of thinking about
> money we still have to get the concepts right in order that the system
> can actually serve its functional purpose. When we have the courage to
> correct this basic error the populace can free itself from its past
> and enter into a new paradigm.
> https://mrcenter.info/Doc/ConferencePapers/2020/MRC%202020%20A%20systems%20approach%20to%20money_4122020%20rev2_17.01.2021.pdf
LikeLike
nice illustrations!
>
LikeLike
Bringing all this to light is vital.
The Chinese and the US knew that not only Ivermectin but IV Vit C was stopping people from dying from Cov 19 – pneumonia in truth. Then came Dr Marik with his protocols for the establishment debacle adding Zinc, Vit D3 etc but because the Mafia were making trillions all the true scientific dissenters were vilified and the boneheads nodded in harmony.
LikeLike
In my opinion the time has come for a breakdown of all big old quasi-imperial states. The global elites know that the process is unstoppable, but as usual they want to be in the forefront of the process of controlled demolition of these states. Russia and China today both have political systems which can be rather referred to as fascist rather than communist. The merge of government and big business coupled with nationalistic and race superiority propaganda and suppression of ethnic minorities is immanent to both regimes. But we all know and so do the global elites of course that fascist states are doomed for defeat simply because of their nature. So, in the end of the day Chinese hegemony would be quite short lived as we sooner or later will witness independence movements in Turkestan, Inner Mongolia, Tibet and other separatist regions. China is too fragile domestically to be able to manage things internationally. It doesn’t mean that China cannot be used as a tool to manage both the demolition of Russia and weakening of the US for a time being before China implodes from within. One player which I wouldn’t discard in this game is Islamic world. Let’s say Islam and a confederation of Islamic states and regions in the model of a Caliphate could be another Plan B for a world power to shape the world. That’s why whatever happens in Central Asia and Turkestan has to be monitored meticulously.
LikeLike